The article “Our Visual Persuasion Gap” by Martin
Gurri, Craig Denny, and Aaron Harms focuses on the importance of visuals in
conveying a message and how much they influence people’s opinions. The authors
of this article are focusing on showing how persuasive different kinds of visual
pathways can be and how these pathways deliver different messages.
This article does not include a statistical study
or survey but it does show relationship between the author’s concepts and real
life events. This relationship describes how different visual channels
influence memorable historical events. A limitation that can be seen in this
article is that the study is based on a governmental aspect and focuses mainly
in this. Ways that visual channels impact society and other ethical issues are
not described.
Visuals, according to Gurri et al., are
powerfully persuasive because it creates a more personal connection from the
audience to the issue in hand. Visuals introduce a link where instead of just
hearing about an issue, the audience feels part of the issue as if they were
bystanders.
The author’s concern regarding visual rhetoric
and government communication practices lies in the power used through this
channel. Government can take this channel and corrupt it and abuse by promoting
certain ideals and beliefs that are anti self-governing and encourage
misconduct and criminality.
The author locates many aspects of visual
rhetoric, some of them are “…persuasive themes, master narratives, content and
technical signatures, and indicators of audience resonance and effects.” (Gurry
et al., 2010, pg. 104) Persuasive themes describe how visuals are used to
target a certain audience to persuade it in maintaining certain ideals. Master
narratives appeal to the audience through touching relatable stories such as
martyr stories. Content and technical signatures demonstrate certain artistic
and atmospheric patterns that are significant of a media. The indicators of
audience resonance and effects focus on the response of the audience on certain
visual media. The audience’s response helps the media understand and strategize
visual connection.
The author’s suggest that understanding visual
communication will help the government decipher more accurately foreign
messages and prevent further attacks on the US. The author expects for the
audience to understand the importance that visual communication plays in
today’s society. Although an important communication channel, it can also be
corrupted and used negatively to induce disaster. These ideas will help us use
visuals effectively in our documentary and website.
Reference
Gurri, M., Denny, C., & Harms, A. (2010,
Spring). Our Visual Persuasion Gap. U.S.
Army War College, 40(1), 101-109. Retrieved from http://www.carlisle.army.mil/USAWC/Parameters/Articles/2010spring/40-1-2010_GurriDennyAndHarms.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment